About ArgueResolver

ArgueResolver started as an app for a simple, slightly awkward idea: when two people can't agree, an outside opinion that is honest and fair to both sides can end the argument faster than another round of it. The app records the conversation and gives a verdict; this website brings the same judge to anyone with a browser, plus guides on how to argue better.

ArgueResolver is made by Happread, a small independent app studio.

How the judge decides

The verdict comes from a large language model following detailed written rules that we developed and tested on real recorded disputes in the app. The rules ask it to find the main disagreement, judge each position on substance (is it accurate and relevant?) and conduct (does it help solve the problem?), apply the same standard to both sides, and say plainly when the accounts can't settle it. A valid feeling doesn't prove a factual claim; politeness doesn't make someone right; an insult doesn't make them wrong.

If an account describes violence, threats or coercion, the rules switch off the "who's right" question entirely: the verdict names the concern, doesn't treat it as a negotiating point, and points to help. The judge never diagnoses anyone.

It can still be wrong. It only sees what was typed, usually by one of the two people, and it can't verify anything. That's why every verdict comes with a confidence level and the reasons behind it, so you can disagree with the judge too.

How we write the guides

Our fallacy pages and conflict guides are written to be useful in a real argument: plain definitions, examples that sound like actual people, and replies that lower the temperature. Facts come from published research and reference works (for relationship topics, mainly the Gottman Institute and peer-reviewed studies), and every page lists its sources. We don't invent statistics, and when a topic touches on abuse or safety we say clearly where ordinary conflict ends.

Found a mistake? Tell us on the contact page and we'll fix it.